Christians Protesting Covid-19 Public Health Orders are misguided and missing the greater call
This piece was published in the Winnipeg Free Press on May 12.
As Canadians grow increasingly weary of public health order restrictions and are frustrated by the continual infringement on their daily lives, there are some churches pushing back against public health orders that deny them the opportunity to gather together to worship and support one another in community.
A few of these churches have found unlikely allies in those who are constantly wary of governments trying to limit individual citizen’s personal rights. Most recently this “alliance” has resulted in legal challenges in the courts citing that these health orders violate certain Charter-protected freedoms of conscience, religion, expression and peaceful assembly.
While they may believe that they are acting in the best interests of Christian discipleship and God’s call, sadly, they are misguided on several fronts.
One of the pastors involved is quoted as saying: “We have no authority, scripturally-based and based on Christian convictions, to limit anyone from coming to hear the word of God. We have no authority to tell people you can’t come to church. That’s in God’s jurisdiction.”
However, the New Testament presents quite a different picture of the responsibility of the Church for itself. The first instance of this pops up in Matthew’s Gospel in two places.
Initially, when Peter is given the revelation about who Jesus truly is, Jesus begins to share God’s authority with the disciples. “I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven,” he said. (Matt. 16:19)
This authority is not limited to Peter. The same authority is given to the gathered assembly of Christ’s disciples. (Matthew 18:18)
In addition, much of the content of the New Testament Epistles, particularly those written by Paul, constantly confronts and admonishes churches to teach, direct and sometimes even discipline their members so as to not hinder or distort the mission of the Gospel in the world, and Christ’s command to his Church.
And what is that Gospel? It is the supreme command of Jesus Christ “to love one another as I (Jesus) have loved you.”
In 1 Corinthians chapter 9, Paul outlines the many ways in which he sacrifices his own self, his rights and privileges, his freedom in Christ, in order to effectively witness to the love of Christ. “I have become all things to all people, that I might by all means save some,” he said. (I Cor. 9:22)
For the Christian disciple, the effective demonstration and proclamation of the love of God for all people must take precedence over any personal demand or freedom. This is what it means to serve the Lord. The New Testament even uses the stronger term “slave” to describe a Christian’s devotion to Christ.
Another pastor was quoted as saying: “We are here to fight for God, we are here to defend the vulnerable.”
Surely the vulnerable we need to be worried about are those being exposed to the Covid-19 virus by persons not following the public health orders. Surely it is those languishing on ventilators in ICUs in hospitals across our country who are the most vulnerable!
Some might call into question the whole nature of what I am saying. Should a Christian publicly challenge the actions of other Christians? Is that not being judgmental?
Not when the integrity of the proclamation of the Gospel is at stake. This practice of dismissing the call to love and protect all of God’s creatures by complying with the health orders — especially the most vulnerable — in the midst of this pandemic, needs to be strongly challenged for the sake of the Gospel and the integrity of its promise of abundant life for all.